Heat up your career with our Summer Sale
Globally, ratio analysis is one of the most important management tools. What is ratio analysis looks at the multiple uses of ratios. How ratios, also known as performance indicators, can identify positive and negative changes in business operations. The identification of these changes can positively influence future strategic planning, decision and operational control.
Ratio analysis, whilst primarily an internal control process, is also a key tool used by investors in assessing the viability of current business customers and future business clients.
When you perform ratio analysis you are comparing historical data for example, the previous year’s financial statements against the current years financial statements.
Whilst ratios, also called performance indictors, are primarily an internal management tool, they have equal value to external investors and lenders who want to gauge the viability and health of their clients' or potential client's business.
Performance indicators identify all changes in trading, production and operational efficiency. Ongoing, monitoring for change is more cost effective as it allows management to plan for future changes rather than react to a change when it happens.
In theory and to demonstrate the scope of analysis; every time a manager thinks, 'I wonder if that could be better', a quick ratio calculation, will deliver the answer provided the data is available to compare.
You'll see many of the popularly used performance indicators later in this blog and whilst the list is comprehensive, what you see is merely a drop in the ocean. The strength and success of ratio analysis is in the infinite range of ratio possibilities, with most being uniquely developed within individual companies.
Trading changes can occur at anytime through shifts in global events, changing market trends, variations in product life cycle, changes in production, natural seasonal variation or higher levels of competition.
Any or multiple changes can affect trading activity so management require an analysis process capable of identifying and measuring the effect of each change. Not all changes require action, but a constant awareness of all changes is a good reflection on the effectiveness of the management team.
The more effective these management processes are, the faster change is identified and the sooner plans can be made.
There is little a business can do to avoid the affect of global events on their business. The event is often unexpected giving little or no notice.
An example of this was the war in Ukraine and the effect it had on oil prices. Every business in the UK suffered significant utility cost increases, which affected trading prices and trading levels.
In this sort of situation owners walk a tight rope of trying to absorb the higher costs, keeping staff employed and trying to grow sales to compensate.
Not all additional costs can be absorbed so hard decisions have to be made. Should selling prices be increased to a customer base that are also struggling. Increases risk a reduction in sales and customer loyalty. Or should measures be taken to reduce operational costs, which could be reducing staff levels.
In the situation above, ratio analysis would be at the forefront of measuring the effects overall on the business. Based on the analysis, ongoing reactive management decisions will be made. In cases like this, the responses can only be reactive instead of planned because of the immediacy and transient nature of the event.
Most changing market trends can to a degree be predicted because they rarely change over overnight. This is particularly the case in manufacturing of large industrial products. The ongoing production and profitability analysis would initially highlight a slow shift either upwards or downwards. This indicator gives management the opportunity to plan their future responses.
In the case of the trend rising, decisions would be made on the sustainability of the rise. Then whether to increase production whilst also considering all associated costs for instance, a potential that borrowing is needed or additional staffing. When able to future plan, decisions are more considered and better deals can be forged to meet any changes.
In the case of a downward sales trend the decisions are more complex. Initial analysis would assess the period of time available to change the trend to rising, but is that possible. Many questions will be asked:
Every product will have a natural life cycle so it’s important to monitor sales of all significant profit earning products. Monitoring allows the right decisions to be made either to invest in extending the peak of the product life cycle, provided that is possible or ultimately, when to withdraw a product from sale.
Some product life cycles, particularly in retail, walk a very fine line of rapid rise and rapid fall, as I have experienced in my past companies many times. These short-term products are often referred to as fads, which can sometimes mask the rapid and huge profits fads can generate.
A high earning retail product such as a fad, can become on trend overnight and at its life cycle peak, have the demand way outstripping its availability. In these instances, the limitation of ratio analysis is very apparent as there isn't the time to generate the data for any reliable analysis.
With retail 'trend products', the end of the life cycle is usually as rapid as its initial start and knowing when to stop ordering, is down to the expertise and instinct of the managers. It's a decision that is never exactly accurate and inevitability, some obsolete stock is left.
Operational ratios are also key measures in production output to ensure a product remains profitable. There are several ways in which production profitability can change.
Volume of items produced can increase or decrease. It is important to quickly know why, because profitability is based on expected output and not actual output.
Likewise, the cost of materials and labour will be analysed for production cost variance and production efficiencies. For instance, if labour costs have increased, why?
In the latter instances, the productivity ratios are likely to see a positive rise in material costs and an adverse decline in labour costs.
When measuring a products overall performance, it’s necessary to have accurate information, which includes recognising and accounting for seasonal variations.
For example, winter coats will be a top seller from early autumn to late winter and an abysmal seller throughout the summer. Calculating seasonal variations to adjust for winter products or equally summer products, will smooth out the spike effect of the variation to show the products true profitability.
All astute businesses will monitor their competitors performance in the hope that they can gain a competitive edge. Whilst it isn’t possible to know a competitors product by product performance, it is possible to monitor their sales, promotions, product changes, product launches and revamp launches.
By monitoring their trading activity, it is possible to accurately assess through ratio analysis, how the competitor activities are growing and affecting your company's sales. This kind of analysis allows company's to take responsive market actions.
Operational efficiencies are constantly changing often due to uncontrollable external factors.
Constant ratio analysis will identify and highlight areas where decisions are required to sustain operational stability.
Some decisions will be significant and affect staff, sales or the way a business is run.
Other decisions, will be small and unnoticed, but none the less contribute equally to the profitability and viability of the company's financial health.
The figures for financial ratio analysis will come either from the Income Statement (Profit and Loss) or Statement of Financial Position (Balance Sheet).
If the financial ratio analysis is regarding trading activities i.e. monitoring changes in turnover, cost of the goods sold, gross and net profit then the ratios will be calculated from the Income Statement. These ratios are collectively called profitability ratios.
In contrast, if the ratios are measuring the Company's total asset worth, including intangible assets or the debt of the company, the measurements are taken from the Statement of Financial Position. Depending on what is being assessed the ratios could be debt to equity ratios, quick ratios or collectively financial ratios.
Ratios are excellent tools that business management cannot do without. However, as with any business tool, they have limitations. For a business to gain optimum performance that they can trust from the ratios calculated, they must be aware of the pitfalls that accompany financial accounting ratio analysis.
Whilst the numbers themselves never lie, ratios can be misleading when the basis or fundamentals of the information isn’t comparable in its entirety. Or if a collective range of ratios are compared with differing risk factors.
For example, if four ratios had a risk factor of 10%, 10% 15% and 70%, the resulting average risk factor of 26% would not be a true reflection because it is skewed by the 70%. Its false overall risk assessment would offer no valuable contribution to current or future decision making. A way around this is to remove the lowest and highest in the range to get a more realistic ratio, but even then, the figure isn't true unless the sample is wide.
There are significant limitations, due to lack of information, when using ratio analysis to assess a competitors performance. The best performance analysis comes from the fine details that you know within the Company where you work. The same level of detail cannot be known about a competitors performance.
Another area where financial ratio analysis can be unreliable is when they are extrapolated to predict future trends.
If a 5-year range of sales growth ratios are used to predict growth for the next 5 years, the prediction increasingly becomes unreliable the further it is extended.
Extrapolation relies on a linear prediction that could in theory be calculated to infinity. In reality, infinity is not possible because at some point, market saturation would occur where products exceeded possible customers. Likewise, linear predictions do not account for changing inflation levels, market volatility, potential risks or changing popularity and trends.
You’ll later read about the liquidity ratio which calculates a company’s ability to pay short-term debts when they fall due.
By its nature, liquidity is looking at the short-term financial situation now. It does not take into account payment of long-term debt and events that could significantly affect short-term liquidity in the future.
Financial ratio analysis is a key area of learning in many professions and is particularly important in accountancy because it identifies the story behind the numbers.
During the AAT qualification studies, financial ratio analysis is studied in depth at AAT Level 3 and again at AAT Level 4 where a more comprehensive understanding is built.
Whilst financial ratio analysis isn't studied at AAT Level 2, I would highly recommend that you read this blog. It is never too early to widen your accounting practice knowledge, particularly in the broader aspects of business.
All students, AAT or CIMA will find that understanding the wider aspects of business, often beyond the level of your study, simplifies how and what you learn. This is because understanding the bigger picture adds context to the topics learnt, context added to theory reduces the complexity of the theory.
Financial ratio analysis is a method of accounting that evaluates a company's financial statements and financial data to measure performance, operational efficiency, liquidity, effectiveness and profitability. All analysis of key ratios including, profitability, liquidity, efficiency and current, works by comparing two or more sets of company data that will determine the company's stability, growth or trading decline.
When done well, financial ratio analysis is an operational x-ray machine. The analysis process leaves no stone unturned in the pursuit of efficiency and effectiveness to improve future performance.
Below are the main families of accounting ratios formulas and ratio calculations used to some degree in in most businesses.
Measure how effectively a company turns revenue into profit. Profitability ratios are essential for evaluating a company’s financial performance and understanding where stock prices have fluctuated or operational activities have become less efficient.
Common performance indicators include:
The following ratios determine if your business can generate profits effectively from its assets and equity.
Liquidity ratios show the company’s ability to pay its operational debts as they fall due. Without strong liquidity, the business is at risk of falling into debt with its suppliers, which long-term if not resolved, would cause the business to close.
Main performance indicators for liquid assets:
Solvency ratios examine long-term stability and debt structure. They reveal a company’s ability to service its debt by making long-term interest payments and meeting all debt obligations as they arise.
Key examples:
A strong DSCR and low D/E indicate resilience under changing market conditions and market volatility.
Efficiency ratios measure how well a company uses its assets to generate sales and control costs. They reflect on the operational efficiency and the company's asset management skills.
Typical ratios include:
The above evaluate whether the working capital is being utilised effectively in current performance and effectively to support future growth.
| Metric | Ratio Formula | Inputs £m | Worked Numbers £m | Interpretations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profitability | Gross profit / Sales | 724 / 759 | 95% | A good gross profit margin above 70% is very good |
| Profitability | Net Profit / Sales | 143.6 / 759 | 19% | A good net profit margin above is above 10% - Strong above 20% |
| Leverage | Debt to Equity Ratio | 278.4 / 44.4 | 6.27 | Whilst there is a high debt ratio, it doesn’t mean they cannot pay their debt |
| Liquidity | Current Assets / Current Liabilities | 313.3 / 278.4 | 1.13 | Any current ratio above 1 is considered good. |
| Efficiency | Cost of Goods Sold / Average Stock (Average between opening & closing stock) | N/A in a Service Industry | N/A | A good stock turnover ratio will vary from industry to industry |
| Metric | Accounting Ratio Formula | Inputs Used | Worked Example | Interpretation | Caveats |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | Gross Profit ÷ Revenue | £400k ÷ £1m | 40% | Strong margin showing good pricing control | Watch for negative gross profit margin in low-demand periods |
| Current Ratio | Current Assets ÷ Current Liabilities | £500k ÷ £300k | 1.67 | Healthy liquidity | Excess assets may indicate inefficiency |
| Debt to Equity | Total Debt ÷ Shareholders Equity | £250k ÷ £500k | 0.5 | Balanced funding mix | Compare with industry trends |
| Inventory Turnover | COGS ÷ Average Inventory | £600k ÷ £100k | 6 | Efficient stock movement | Varies across same industry |
| Net Profit Margin | Net Profit ÷ Revenue | £150k ÷ £1m | 15% | Solid profitability | May fluctuate with market volatility |
Is a measure of valuing a company’s stock by comparing it to its financial performance data. This can then assess whether there is an over or under share valuation based on industry norms. Example: Earning Per Share and E.B.I.T.D.A
E.B.I.T.D.A stands for Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortisation. It is a measure of the profitability of a company based on its core operational performance.
By removing the costs of borrowing and non-monetary entries i.e. writing down of assets, it shows a momentary picture of the money generated by a business in its daily trading activities.
E.B.I.T.D.A is frequently used as the starting point of negotiations for a company buyout. It is only a basis though and many other company ratios and factors will be discussed and agreed before a deal is reached.
Other factors:
Trend analysis looks at how ratios change over time. You might review the current ratio, net profit margin, and efficiency ratios year on year to see whether profitability and liquidity are improving or declining.
A selection of the questions asked of those ratios:
Plotting your findings on a graph shows instant movement that supports trend analysis for better planning.
Whilst the ratio examples listed above are some of the generic financial ratios that apply to all industries, it’s important to understand that there are 1000’s of industry or company specific formulas in use daily.
Financial analysis generally compare current performance against historic data to best inform on growth, decline, efficiency and market share performance.
Some formulas however, are not year on year comparisons but product or even staff comparisons.
For example, if you wanted to optimise the efficiency of product stock ordering system, both in the frequency of the order and the quantities ordered, you would calculate the ratio of how many times each product is turned over per month. You can also calculate whether a product hits a 'stock out' position during the period between orders and if it does, for how many days.
The ratios above will show you if the current re-order process is the ideal number of days apart and whether the right quantities are being ordered each time. However, identifying the ratio results is not necessarily a requirement to change. Other factors need to be considered:
Financial ratios analysis and trend analysis, when done well, allows management to fine tune every aspect of their business operations for optimum efficiency. Ratio calculations are not solutions in themselves, they are identifiers that initiate informed decisions for growth and gaining the competitive edge.
Visualising Trends
A calculated ratio is only useful if the information is easily readable to the end user. It’s frequently said that a picture speaks a thousand words and in statistics this is usually true. This term can be expanded further by saying, the best analysis is that which achieves the best readability.
Each set of statistics requires thought as to the best diagrammatic presentation otherwise, the efforts of producing the data is wasted.
The following diagrams are examples of a poor and then a good choice of diagrammatic presentation. The tables and diagrams are showing the same trends of four different ratios over a period of eight years
| Metric | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | Year 6 | Year 7 | Year 8 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity | 0.41% | 4.81% | 7.56% | 11.59% | 6.32% | 9.62% | 10.08% | 16.20% | 8.32% |
| Gross Margin | 28.21% | 31.15% | 31.72% | 32.72% | 33.73% | 35.97% | 35.26% | 36.48% | 33.15% |
| EBITDA Margin | 5.01% | 7.03% | 7.84% | 8.26% | 7.63% | 9.98% | 9.41% | 10.53% | 8.21% |
| EBIT Margin | 1.55% | 3.53% | 4.51% | 4.89% | 4.22% | 4.73% | 4.49% | 5.52% | 4.18% |
When is ratio analysis important?
A ratio is only worthwhile, if its calculations add valuable insight for the company to benefit and grow from. This particularly applies to industry average and peer benchmarking.
Liquidity can also be compared, but with limitations:
eer benchmarking is good and useful as a ballpark guideline, provided your ratio expectations remain aware of its limitations. Having said this, there are areas where an analysis of competitors financial statements can be useful to gauge potential weakness in their future prospects.
They say numbers don’t lie and they don’t, provided you know where and what to look at.
Numbers can give you a great insight into a competitor's financial health including the risks it may encounter in its future health. A company may be riding high at the moment, but is that sustainable?
A good measure is to review their balance sheet.
Look at the non-current asset value. It may total millions at cost and on face value look impressive, even daunting, but how old are those assets?
Look at the value of the accumulated depreciation, is it nearly equal to the asset cost value? What is the carrying value. The carrying value (net book value) is the adjusted worth of the usage left in the asset over time. A low net book value points to the assets being old and unlikely to produce at the capacity of modern machinery.
More importantly, old machinery, which can be subject to unreliability, is less likely to be able to respond to the requirements of market changes and trends.
This isn’t necessarily bad, all assets have a life span and will need replacing at some point, but is the competitor in a position to replace when the time comes?
What is the company’s leverage ratio? If borrowing is low then they are able to renew. If borrowing is already high and the asset replacement is imminent and costly:
The above is an example of how ratios can tell you the hidden story behind what on face value is a strong company.
To deep dive on the balance sheet-driven ratios is to show the positive and potentially negative positions of the Company's assets and debt position.
Both financial statements give the overall financial picture of a business and in simple terms, the balance sheet ratios show the good and not so good picture i.e. what the company owns and what the company owes.
This doesn’t imply that debt is bad, it isn’t, it’s a fundamental part of daily operations that allows a company to successfully trade. Debt only becomes bad, if a company has over-borrowed and in doing so, has over-stretched its ability to repay.
Remember in all business, CASH IS KING - if the cash can't meet the repayments and operational costs, it is no longer king putting the company's liquidity in jeopardy.
What is also important to remember is no single financial ratio will tell the whole story.
The working capital mechanics i.e. current assets minus current liabilities is the beating heart of any company. It is the money that flows in and out of the business daily to support the operating cycle.
The operating cycle also known as the cash conversion cycle is the period of time it takes to start and finish a trading cycle.
Industry average:
In order to make a good decision on which ratio is best to assess liquidity, it is necessary to look at the reality of available funds i.e. assets that are either cash or are quickly converted into cash.
Looks only at the physical cash in hand and in the bank minus current liabilities. This ratio is idealistic. Most company are not in a position where physical money available is equal to short-term liabilities.
The cash ratio isn't a true measure of strong or weak liquidity. For instance, stock is sold daily and credit customers pay the business daily, meaning the real funds available to pay current liabilities is higher than the cash in hand and bank alone.
Recognises that more assets are liquid than just money. The quick ratio adds in current assets that are easily turned to cash, these can be marketable securities like stocks, bonds and other market instruments plus accounts receivables.
The quick ratio also known as the acid test includes all assets considered easily liquid.
Considers all current assets are liquid and should be included in the liquidity ratio of current assets minus current liabilities.
he current ratio is the liquidity ratio most commonly used. However, some caution should be taken if a company has an unusually high stock holding because why is it so high?
How saleable is all of the stock? Is some obsolete and unsalable?
Another consideration is that stock whilst there to re-sale, is not easily sold in bulk. If it is necessary to sell quickly and in bulk, the money received is unlikely to be close to the stock valuation listed on the Statement of Financial Position.
A good rule of thumb if investing: question their suppliers and check supporting notes to the accounts before forming a conclusion.
All assessment of performance has imperfections which is why it is important to highlight the limitations to ratio analysis below including it's pitfalls.
In UK GAAP’s costs are expensed in the accounts in the same period as they are incurred. This then ensures an accurate matching of the costs incurred to generate the income. For example, commission on sales is included in the accounts in the month that it was earned from the sales and not when it is paid to the salesman.
Whereas IFRS state, that provided contract related expenses meet a certain criteria, they can be capitalised and amortised (depreciated) across the period of the contract.
Regular non-current asset sales, non-standard trading income and window dressing, do not give a true and fair view of the health of the accounts being produced, which a company is legally bound to show.
To normalise, the company must:
Every ratio makes sense only when you know what to compare it with.
The Office of National Statistics https://www.ons.gov.uk/ has amazing data on all industries and when used as a potential guideline, can have significant value in decision making, growth and market awareness.
Peer benchmarking is a valuable tool to measure a company’s performance against a small sample of competitors. However, care has to be taken if you use ONS data or a competitors data for decision making purposes. As previously written, source data has to be comparable to your data for the ratio to have true value and meaning.
ONS data is an average of multiple sets of data from large and small companies so cannot be accurately aligned with your base data. However, peer comparison accuracies can be valuable for certain ratios such as sales growth, profitability, leverage and efficiency.
Industry benchmarks are helpful in allowing companies to look at the wider aspects of the industry to identify potential trends, opportunities and threats.
A good ratio rating is not generic across a sector and the best demonstration of this is in the retail sector.
For example, an ideal current ratio in most sectors including retail is 1.5-2.0 to 1. However this changes by how quickly stock is turned over and the speed that the business generates sales.
Supermarkets with a fast turnover of stock (inventory) are likely to operate at a ratio of 1.0-1.5 to 1. with many of the very large supermarkets operating very successfully at around 0.75-1 to 1.
This in theory means the supermarket may not be able to pay current liabilities as they fall due. However, in practice, the sheer speed and volume of inventory turnover means bills are comfortably paid when due.
In contrast, in the high-end product retail sector for instance luxury yacht building. The current ratio would aim to be between 2.0- 4.0 to 1 because of the slow turnover in yacht sales.
Typical ranges vary:
When analysing different financial metrics, remember that profitability and liquidity must be balanced. For instance, a company may show strong cash flow but lower earnings compared to peers because of heavy reinvestment or depreciation. These nuances matter when interpreting financial ratios accurately.
Reliable sources include:
Update benchmarks frequently to reflect shifts in market conditions, inflation, and future growth expectations. This ensures your comparison remains aligned with current industry trends and market growth prospect ratios.
No two companies are identical especially if comparing overseas trading. Scale, geography, and business model influence outcomes. Always adjust data for currency differences and local regulations before comparing a company’s financial performance with its peers.
Ratios should guide, not dictate, your analysis of financial and operational health.
Let’s see how ratio calculations look in real scenarios.
Retail businesses depend heavily on inventory management and rapid turnover. Here’s how ratios reveal their efficiency.
| Metric | Formula | Worked Example | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | Current Assets ÷ Current Liabilities | £2.0m ÷ £1.6m = 1.25 | Good and expected liquidity range |
| Inventory Turnover Ratio | Cost of Good Sold ÷ Average Inventory | £8m ÷ £2m = 4 | Good stock rotation, but check seasonality |
| Net Profit Margin | Net Profit ÷ Revenue | £0.5m ÷ £10m = 5% | Acceptable, but improved efficiency ratios would raise net profits and increase growth potential |
Software firms prioritise scalability and profitability.
| Metric | Formula | Worked Example | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | (Revenue – COGS) ÷ Revenue | (£5m – £1m) ÷ £5m = 80% | Excellent margin |
| Debt to Equity Ratio | Total Debt ÷ Shareholders Equity | £0.2m ÷ £1.0m = 0.2 | Very low leverage |
| Interest Coverage Ratio | EBIT ÷ Interest Expense | £0.8m ÷ £0.05m = 16 | Comfortable buffer for interest payments |
This highlights a healthy model with minimal debt obligations and consistent future growth potential.
How does ratio analysis work in financial accounting?
The finances of the company is central to its health, stability and growth. Ratio analysis works by monitoring every aspect of operations to identify change in order to maximise efficiency. Maximum efficiency improves profits and sustains the cash flow within the company.
Which balance sheet ratios matter most for liquidity?
The current ratio is the most realistic and most important ratio for liquidity.
What are the main limitations to ratio analysis?
The limitations of ratio analysis include its reliance on historical data and assumptions that market conditions stay constant, which they don't.
What is the fastest way to learn ratio calculations?
The fastest way to learn ratio analysis is to fully understand what is being calculated and why. Once you understand this, you will know and understand the figures required to tell the story behind each ratio calculated. Ratios shouldn't be treated as formulas to learn by rote, they should be understood and then the formulas come naturally.
Where can I find a list of accounting ratios
There are lists on the internet, but these are not necessarily the interpretations commonly used. You are best to rely on the list that you will be given as part of your studies or even more important, the list your employer uses.
Join the thousands of individuals, small businesses, and large corporations who trust e-Careers.
Chat with our friendly experts today to discuss your training needs. Call us now on
Alternatively, you can request a callback
Enquire Now